Verified by Fetch Hive
For engineers, engineering managers, and QA, turn a pasted architecture decision review into a structured Bitbucket pull request with its decision, rationale, trade-offs, and open questions. A human reviews the draft before anything is created in the supplied repository.
How it works
Paste the ADR review summary and enter the Bitbucket workspace, repository, source branch, and target branch. The workflow extracts the decision, rationale, trade-offs, and unresolved questions, then drafts a decision-review pull request. A person must approve the draft before the workflow creates the pull request.
Good for
Engineers, engineering managers, and QA reviewing architecture decisions.
What runs, step by step
Provide your input
ADR review summary, Bitbucket workspace, Repository slug, Source branch, and Target branch
Extract ADR decision review
Capture the decision, reasons, trade-offs, and unresolved questions
Draft decision-review pull request
Write a clear PR title and structured, source-grounded description
Approve PR creation
Review the title and description before any Bitbucket write
Create Bitbucket pull request
Create the approved review PR from the supplied branches
More templates like this
Workflow
3
uses
AI Visibility Checker
Runs a customer question through ChatGPT and Gemini, looks up tracked ChatGPT conversations and AI search volume for the topic, and extracts the brands and sources in each answer. Returns one JSON object per data source.
tom_alan
Workflow
1
uses
Community Co-Host Leads From Referring Organizations
For community program managers and executives, this workflow reads a program website and its live backlinks to identify organizations worth approaching as potential event co-hosts. It returns a prioritized table with each referring page and an evidence-based reason to reconnect.
Fetch Hive
